19Mar/11Off
Diabetics Cured Within 30 Days
After eating raw foods, 6 diabetics are declared cured within 30 days. This isn't considered possible in Western Medicine, but what do we know? :) This is the trailer to "Raw For 30 Days," a film now in post production and expected to be shown at film festivals this spring (2008), with a release in theaters to follow. Visit their website for updates: www.rawfor30days.com For more info on natural cures, visit my blog: Red Pill Reich redpillreich.blogspot.com I am a nurse who is exposing the Illuminati's use of modern medicine to drug, poison and control millions in their pursuit of a New World Order.
February 1st, 2011 - 19:33
@BarzOnTheWindow1 Don’t count on it… I’m sure there will be a cure someday. I’m convinced that there is no such as an incurable disease! Only that we lack the technology and KNOWLEDGE currently to do so. I’ll bet in my lifetime I’ll see Cancer, AIDS, and many other “incurable” diseases, CURED!!
February 1st, 2011 - 19:46
@graceoverall I envy your enthusiasm …prepare for the worst …hope for the best…
February 1st, 2011 - 20:15
@BarzOnTheWindow1 Indeed… words of wisdom :)
February 1st, 2011 - 20:15
@BarzOnTheWindow1 Indeed… words of wisdom :)
February 1st, 2011 - 20:15
@BarzOnTheWindow1 Indeed… words of wisdom :)
February 5th, 2011 - 00:29
@2006edsel
You mean diseases like polio, small pox and pneumonia? Oh wait, we totally have cures for those and many more. It makes zero sense for any industry to withhold cures for a disease. The company that comes up with a cure for diabetes will make billions. A lot of research is also conducted by universities. So, unless 100% of universities in the world that conduct medical research are conspiring against the world, a cure cannot be withheld. What – you think we’ll run out of diseases?
February 6th, 2011 - 09:42
pretty simple you are what you eat, breath, drink, think, etc. Put only good stuff in. peaceeeeeee
February 19th, 2011 - 01:07
Give ME a chance!! I would LOVE to go there & learn this!!
February 21st, 2011 - 08:10
I want to do this!!! How do you get on this show :)?
February 23rd, 2011 - 20:45
@smaakjeks the cures from universities research are recorded into the records but are quickly covered up,
use your common sense friend, if you found a gold vain and was making money would you tell me where your vain was at? NO!! you wouldn’t, but would you want me telling others where a greater vain of greater size and value so the people you are selling yours to can get it free, No you wouldn’t want that in fact you might want to kill me to keep me from telling, think about that friend
February 23rd, 2011 - 20:55
@NLOLIN4Solar
Sitting on a gold ore vein without telling anyone that you found it leaves it available for others to stake the claim before you do. And again, even if by magic this business plan was lucrative, everyone in the world researching in the area would have to be in on the conspiracy. Tens of thousands of people. Yet how many did it take for the Watergate scandal to be revealed? 4 guys.
Also, what about the diseases that HAVE been cured? Why weren’t they kept hidden?
February 23rd, 2011 - 21:28
@smaakjeks I don’t know of any cures that have been publicized for real was they great discoveries No,
was they prior to 1960 when the Pharmaceutical companies rolled in, Why is it that B-17 has not been recognized by the FDA for being the cure for cancer, WHY? because you can not patent a natural cure and if you cant patent it it’s not a cure, you can NOT make money, I think you have lived a sheltered life or in the dark, you really need to wake up,
February 23rd, 2011 - 21:35
@NLOLIN4Solar I really have to add that David Rockefeller funded the pharmaceutical co, to get established get their roots set in, because EVERY pharmaceutical drug has petroleum in them and who gains billions in profits
David Rockefeller Co. tell me again how petrolatum play a roll in our bodies, High cholesterol meds are the biggest hokes ever perpetrated on man, The human body naturally levels out cholesterol, mine was 500 4 months later below normal I took NO type of meds
February 23rd, 2011 - 21:42
@NLOLIN4Solar
I must also add you really don’t want to get into a battle of wits because you are clearly un armed and un aware and very uninformed , ill informed at the most I should add, I have researched I have seen documentation of cures suppressed by our own Government, it’s a don’t ask don’t tell situation, thank God for the freedom to know act But you have to ask FIRST they will NEVER TELL YOU ANYTHING
February 23rd, 2011 - 21:42
@NLOLIN4Solar
“I don’t know of any cures that have been publicized for real was they great discoveries No”
Polio, small pox, yellow fever, malaria, HPV, hepatitis, tetanus… Those are off the top of my head.
“Why is it that B-17 has not been recognized by the FDA for being the cure for cancer”
THE cure? No research that I’m aware of concludes that vitamins can cure any form of cancer (there’s more than one). That’d be why.
Conditions that vitamins do cure are published without any hassle.
February 23rd, 2011 - 21:45
@NLOLIN4Solar
“you really don’t want to get into a battle of wits because you are clearly un armed and un aware and very uninformed , ill informed at the most I should add, I have researched I have seen documentation of cures suppressed by our own Government”
I’m after the truth, no matter where it leads. So, you must have masses of evidence after all your research, then. Let’s start with research substantiating that B-17 cures cancer. You can PM me references of peer reviewed literature.
February 24th, 2011 - 04:22
@smaakjeks exactly you can not make a claim a vitamin can cure a disease like cancer,
because the FDA has passed a law that states only a drug can cure a desease so if you say B-17 cures cancer which it does,then you are proscribing a drug without a license YOU will be arrested,No research your aware of, That’s just it YOU ARE NOT AWARE,the research has been done by-Universities,doctors caring doctors will tell their patiants about B-17, Get aware buddy look up B-17 see what you get
February 25th, 2011 - 16:36
@NLOLIN4Solar
“because the FDA has passed a law that states only a drug can cure a desease”
Which law is this?
“the research has been done by-Universities,doctors caring doctors will tell their patiants about B-17, Get aware buddy look up B-17 see what you get”
I’m not the one making the claim, you are. Therefore I think you should provide me with evidence in your support. So, perhaps we should come to an agreement of what constitutes evidence. Sound good to you?
February 25th, 2011 - 18:32
@smaakjeks You want to argue for the sake of arguing your not showing any type of intelligence, you are a perfect example of narrow mindedness, here is a video with well known Doctors with their names that support B-17 you can look them up and their research, I was once closed minded like you I did my own home work, now do yours
watch the video it’s number 5 of 6 videos this list doctors names and research I’ll IM them to you
February 25th, 2011 - 18:52
@NLOLIN4Solar
“You want to argue for the sake of arguing”
No, I don’t. I want us to come to an agreement on what we perceive as evidence. I for one think highly of peer reviewed articles of scientific research. That’s the literature one seeks out when asking scientific questions. Do you agree with that?
“your not showing any type of intelligence”
I think you’ve insulted or belittled me in every single response to me. There’s no need for that.
February 25th, 2011 - 19:55
@smaakjeks Need for that hummm have you looked at any of the information I sent, have you written the names down of the doctors in the video, have you done anything on your own, you act as if you want this just handed to you on a silver platter without doing any research for yourself, if you feel insulted then what I have said applies to you if you feel belittled it’s because of your lack of knowledge just means I’m speaking above your comprehension sorry about that
February 26th, 2011 - 00:19
@NLOLIN4Solar
You have directed me towards general dot com sites. I’m interested in evidence. For the third time…. What constitutes good evidence in your opinion?
“if you feel insulted then what I have said applies to you”
Um no. Let’s just stay on topic, shall we? The more you insist on my ignorance, the more desperate it appears.
“if you feel belittled it’s because of your lack of knowledge”
I don’t FEEL belittled. You literally spend half of your posts jabbing at me.
February 26th, 2011 - 03:46
@smaakjeks I have directed you to names of Doctors all over the world and there credentials you
are being stuburn and not researching them names you keep ignoring what I send you,
I’m not jabbing @ you,Your just stubborn an thick headed,I directed you to 2 dot come sites,I told you where to get this information even told you how,So fare U haven’t acknowledge any of it, you just keep asking where is it at,I keep telling you for the 10th time.Look up them names read their research it’s documented
February 26th, 2011 - 08:53
@NLOLIN4Solar
“I have directed you to names of Doctors all over the world and there credentials”
So, evidence, in your opinion, is the mere fact that people TELL you that B-17 cures cancer?
It seems you haven’t looked at any of the actual research on this, otherwise you could just give me a reference list. Ask me about my field of research and I can give you references till you’re blue in the head. Not just names, or websites. The research itself. The experiments.
February 26th, 2011 - 09:05
@NLOLIN4Solar
So, I had a little look in the scientific literature myself and found a review of the research done so far. It’s from 2007, so quite recent.
Milazzo, S. et al. (2007). “Laetrile for cancer: a systematic review of the clinical evidence”. Published in Supportive Care in Cancer. Vol 15. No 6. p583-595.
Their conclusion was that: “the claim that laetrile has beneficial effects for cancer patients is not supported by sound clinical data.”
See, this is much more useful than names.